Camera surveillance using digital technology is a recent
development. In spite of the obvious technical advantages it takes time for this
knowledge to filter through to all levels of the distribution chain. It is easy
to see that people don’t want to write off an earlier investment, particularly
if the existing system is presumed to work well. But actually how good is
actually the functionality compared to the latest technology and do you really
need to exchange all parts of an existing system?
This last
chapter of the Network Video Academy outlines what upgrade options there are for
an existing analogue system. It highlights the fact that the functionality –
previously thought to be good enough – now can be enhanced further using the
latest digital technology.
As you have read in previous chapters of the Network Video
Academy, there is a strong trend towards a move from analogue to digital,
networked, server-based surveillance solutions. With this in mind it’s probably
not a wise decision to continue to invest in analogue components. On the other
hand, you can’t just discard an earlier investment if it works fine and still
has a couple of years in it. In this chapter, we will illustrate how you can
move step-by-step from analogue to digital.
Benefits
of going digitalFor the past 20 years, monitoring and surveillance
applications have been served by analogue technology. CCTV has traditionally
been recorded on VCRs (video cassette recorders), and because of its perceived
ease of use and manageable price point, analogue was probably the right choice
at the time of purchase. However, the rise of digital technology has laid bare
the many shortcomings of analogue solutions. Analogue CCTV systems are generally
maintenance intensive, offer no remote accessibility and are notoriously
difficult to integrate with other systems. Despite these obvious deficiencies,
the end user who has invested in cameras, cables, etc, and is satisfied with the
current quality is right to ask, “Why buy new equipment?”
Implementing a
digital system does not mean throwing away those trusted (and already paidfor)
cameras. With IP-Surveillance, you can still use all the cameras, lenses, and
cables in place through this step-by-step migration to digital technology. And
if this is not sufficient reason to seriously consider an upgrade, examine the
TLV, or time-lapse video, recording component. These systems are highly labour
intensive because of the need to change tapes and perform system maintenance.
Tape wear and tear is an ever-present problem. Furthermore, the actual quality
of the images recorded is often unsatisfactory, particularly if used for
official investigations. With the introduction of digital video recorder (DVR)
technology, the storage media are no longer dependent on operator intervention
or tape quality. And with IP-Surveillance technology, the video server and
network server represent the next level of improvement by connecting existing
cameras to the network with a video server and then storing the images on the
network server.
Step-by-step migration
OK, so how do we do it – and what potential traps do we
need to avoid? Let’s start with a typical, analogue solution from the 1990-ies.
(Fig 1). One easy and attractive solution could
be to just replace the TLV with a DVR.
(Fig 2).
With the spread of digital recording technology, its many advantages
have become apparent: ease of use, advanced search capabilities, simultaneous
record and playback, no image degradation, improved compression and storage,
integration potential, and so on.
It’s likely that you might want to add
more cameras to the solution. If they are installed in the same room as, or
close to, the DVR – all you have to do is to connect the cameras to the DVR with
coax cables.
(Fig 3). But what options do you have if you
want to connect them directly to the existing network or place the cameras
further away from the DVR, on another floor or in another building?
No
problem really, you can easily add network cameras to the same network and let a
server act as recording unit.
This looks like an obvious and
cost-effective solution. But it isn’t, we have actually built ourselves into a
dead-end. Now we have all the images at two separate locations and it’s really
two separate systems. What we should have done, right from the beginning, is to
have made the analogue cameras IP-based through a video server. Lately, most
manufacturers of advanced DVRs have added support for connecting network cameras
directly to the DVR through the network; this puts an end to any problems with
further expansion.
(Fig 4). If this decision had
been taken at the start, it would have been much easier to expand with more
cameras as well as other applications like access control and remote monitoring.
(Fig 5). Remote
accessibilityThe main benefit from connecting those analogue cameras
to a network is that the user can now see surveillance images from any computer
on the network – without the need and expense of additional hardware or
software. If you have a port to Internet, you can securely connect from anywhere
in the world to view a chosen facility or even a single camera from your
surveillance system. By using a Virtual Private Network (VPN) or the company
intranet, you can manage passwordprotected access to images from the
surveillance system. Similar to secure payment over the Internet, a user’s
images and information are kept secure and viewed only by approved personnel.
Unlimited, secure storage
Store as many hours of images as you want – provided you have hard
disk capacity. And store and view images off-site in any location in cases where
monitoring and storage are mission critical or need back up.
Flexible, pro-active image distribution Take snapshots
of an intruder or incident and send by e-mail to police or appropriate
authorities. Also, police or other passwordapproved parties can log on to
cameras and view activities around a user’s facilities.
Automatic alerts The video server can automatically send
an e-mail with an alarm image to selected e-mail addresses, so the right people
have the information they need to take timely action.
Other application areas Cameras can send images to more
than one resource simultaneously. As an example cameras can be connected to an
access control system that records an image every time someone goes in or out
through a door, while it at the same time sends images to a server.
Total cost of ownership and performance At
the beginning of this section, we listed the many advantages of digital
technology, but it bears repeating that with no further need of time-lapse video
equipment, no more tapes and no more tape changing and cataloguing are required.
Maintenance costs go way down. And while system performance and results markedly
increase, total cost of ownership over time will continue to decrease.
IP-Surveillance provides all the superior functionality of digital
technology, plus the tremendous benefits of increased accessibility, storage and
distribution of images, and a superior costbenefit picture. At this point,
analogue owners are convinced it’s time to make the switch, but what factors
need to be taken into consideration?
Factors to
consider At this point, we’ve seen that the transition from an
existing analogue system to a high-functioning digital IP-Surveillance system
can be done step-by-step and in a cost-effective manner, but there are still a
number of factors to consider. What about network bandwidth, bandwidth
connections (network, xDSL, ISDN, cellular phone etc.), hard disk storage
requirements and software?
Network Bandwidth
If you are using a local network, cameras can be patched through a special
dedicated router for the camera, thus eliminating most concerns about bandwidth.
However, if images are sent by PSTN, bandwidth considerations do come into play.
To get a performance of 30 frames per second, you need a minimum bandwidth of
120 kB/s.
Hard disk space Hard disk
storage requirements are dependent on the frame rate of the video you want to
store. If you want to store all video at 30 frames per second (30 fps) as
opposed to 1 fps, then that requires 30 times the amount of storage. Each
application has different recording and storage needs in terms of video frames
per second, and hard disk storage requirements will differ accordingly.
Software applications A wide variety of
software applications can be used. The choice of software to use is governed by
the end-user application and their specific needs. An example of application
software is Milestone's Xprotect Business product; advanced and highly scalable
video surveillance software with built-in motion detection, intelligent PTZ
patrolling features, high capacity recording and remote access via the web.
Another is management software from SeeTec, software for remote camera
configuration and management, direct or automatic control of cameras and
accessory equipment, image representation, display and message forwarding.
Conclusion A digital solution is easier
and cheaper than you might think. Even with the enormous growth of CCTV and the
recent acceleration in migration to digital video technology, significant
hurdles remain for a majority of users in making the switch from analogue to
digital video recording. Many end users are still not aware that there is a
step-by-step path available to transform existing analogue security systems to
digital technology. In terms of education, most end users still need a deeper
understanding of the benefits and possibilities of digital and network-based
surveillance systems. It is also important to know that in the transition from
analogue to digital surveillance systems, no system is too small or too tightly
tied to analogue technology, to benefit from digital technology. Even a single
analogue camera connected to a video server will provide the user with the full
range of advantages that come from digital, networked surveillance.
Consider the ease and cost-effectiveness of a progressive, step-by-step
move to digital with IPSurveillance. Now is the right time to take the digital
step.